Terpene Effects Chart: Mapping Cannabis Compounds to Consumer Experiences Through Sensory Science

The modern cannabis consumer is no longer interested in simple strain names or THC percentages; they want more predictable experiences. This has created an opportunity for brands to differentiate through effect-based formulations, i.e., products that deliver specific sensory and functional outcomes through careful terpene profile engineering.

This shift presents an opportunity (and a challenge!) for product strategists and R&D teams. While the market potential for effect-oriented products is substantial, creating reliable, consistent experiences requires effort. It demands a systematic approach to understanding the relationship between terpene compounds, their combinations, and their effects.

Developing an effect-based terpene matrix combines traditional sensory science with new approaches to create a reliable framework for product development. This allows product developers to move beyond the limitations of strain-based thinking toward targeted formulation strategies that deliver consistent consumer experiences.

Key Takeaways

• Due to genetic and cultivation variability, strain names are inconsistent and unreliable for predicting effects; hence, the shift to effect-based formulations.
• Using terpene profiles to craft products based on targeted effects (e.g., calm, energy, creativity) allows for more reliable, consistent, and science-driven product development.
• Combining trained human sensory panels with machine learning enables cannabis brands to map terpene profiles to specific effects.
• An integrated “effect matrix” that maps terpene profiles to their effect spectra provides a structured framework for building consistent, multisensory cannabis experiences.

The Evolution Beyond Strain-Based Formulation

Traditional cannabis product development relied heavily on strain names as proxies for expected effects, but this approach has limitations. Cannabis strain names, while culturally significant and marketable, have several shortcomings as formulation guides.

Inconsistency

Research shows that strains with identical names can exhibit different phenotypic traits and effects. An analysis of 30 strains with the same market names revealed that many were similar to differently-named varieties than their supposed namesakes. This inconsistency makes strain names unreliable indicators of chemical composition or effects.

Cultivation Practices

Cultivation practices further complicate the picture, as growing conditions impact terpene expression even within genetically identical plants. A 2023 study found terpene profile variations between identical cannabis strains grown under different conditions. As such, basing formulations on strain names without chemical verification can impact product consistency.

Shifting Consumer Preferences

The market’s move toward effect-based products is a response to these limitations. Cannabis-derived terpenes formulated for targeted effects (e.g., relaxation, energy, creativity, focus) create more reliable product development frameworks than strain names. This approach aligns with consumer preferences, showing that cannabis consumers now prioritize expected effects over strain names when making purchases.

The shift toward effect-based formulation represents a significant opportunity for product strategists working with Premium Terpene Oils to create product differentiation based on measurable, consistent experiences rather than unfounded marketing claims. By developing systematic terpene-effect mapping, brands can deliver on specific experiential promises.

Building an Evidence-Based Effects Framework

Creating a scientifically valid terpene effects chart requires synthesizing multiple data sources and research methods. Rather than relying on a single approach, comprehensive effect mapping integrates complementary data types.

Scientific Literature

Science is the foundation of terpene effect mapping, documenting specific compounds’ pharmacological properties through controlled studies. For example, research shows beta-myrcene exhibits sedative properties through interaction with GABA receptors in the brain. Similarly, limonene displays anxiolytic (anxiety-reducing) properties.

While valuable, most studies examine isolated compounds rather than complex terpene combinations. Further, they often use animal models rather than human subjects, and frequently employ concentrations higher than typical product formulations. These factors create gaps between scientific literature and practical product application.

Human Data

Human sensory panel data bridges these gaps by documenting real-world perceptual effects of specific terpene profiles at product-level concentrations. Well-designed sensory evaluation protocols using trained panelists can quantify subjective experiences (e.g., relaxation, energy, mood enhancement) while controlling for placebo effects and individual variations.

This approach is widely used in the flavor and fragrance industry and applies directly to terpene effect mapping. Terpene Belt Farms leverages slightly modified protocols from established sensory science practice when implementing sensory evaluation. This entails:

1. Panel selection and training involves recruiting diverse participants and training them to identify and score specific sensory attributes without bias. This typically requires 20-40 hours of training with reference standards and calibration exercises.
2. Blind tests minimize expectation bias by ensuring panelists do not know the samples’ composition or expected effects. Identical delivery methods, randomized presentation orders, and controlled environmental conditions further standardize evaluation.
3. Quantitative scoring systems using standardized scales (typically 0-10) for specific attributes (e.g., mental stimulation, physical relaxation, mood elevation) generate numerical data for statistical analyses and correlation with chemical profiles.
4. Replication and validation through multiple testing sessions with different panelist groups ensure results reflect genuine effects rather than chance observations or individual sensitivities.

Combined with chemical analyses of the tested terpene profiles, this framework creates a data foundation for mapping specific compounds and combinations to their perceptual effects. For product strategists, this evidence-based approach transforms terpene selection from intuitive art to quantifiable science.

Terpene Effects Chart: Core Compounds and Their Properties

Although terpene-effects mapping involves complex interactions between compounds, understanding the baseline properties of major terpenes provides essential context for formulation. The following chart outlines primary effects documented through both scientific literature and sensory panel validation:

Primary Monoterpenes

Terpene	Primary Effects	Physiological Mechanism	Concentration Sensitivity	Common Natural Sources	Complementary Terpenes	Product Application Notes
Myrcene (β-myrcene)	Sedation, relaxation, analgesic	GABA receptor modulation; anti-inflammatory	> 0.5 %	Mango; hops; lemongrass	Linalool; β-caryophyllene; humulene	Evening & pain-management formulas
Limonene (d-limonene)	Mood elevation, stress reduction, energy	Serotonin receptor modulation; anti-anxiety	0.1–1.0 % linear	Citrus peels; juniper; peppermint	Terpinolene; α-pinene; β-pinene	Daytime & mood-boosting products
α-Pinene	Mental clarity, alertness, memory	Acetylcholinesterase inhibition	0.1–0.3 % moderate; > 0.3 % strong	Pine needles; rosemary; basil	Limonene; β-pinene; eucalyptol	Focus & creativity blends
Linalool	Anxiety reduction, sleep aid, stress relief	Glutamate & GABA modulation	0.05–0.2 % effective	Lavender; birch bark; coriander	Myrcene; terpineol; geraniol	Relaxation & sleep formulations
Terpinolene	Uplifting, energetic, cerebral	Moderate CNS stimulation	0.05–0.2 % potent	Tea tree; nutmeg; cumin	Ocimene; limonene; α-phellandrene	Creative-stimulation & daytime use

 

Primary Sesquiterpenes

Terpene	Primary Effects	Physiological Mechanism	Concentration Sensitivity	Common Natural Sources	Complementary Terpenes	Product Application Notes
β-Caryophyllene	Stress reduction, anti-inflammatory, analgesic	CB2 receptor activation	Effective 0.1–0.3 %	Black pepper; cloves; hops	Humulene; myrcene; linalool	Pain & inflammation-focused products
Humulene	Appetite suppression, anti-inflammatory	Inflammatory cytokine reduction	Threshold ≈ 0.1 %	Hops; sage; ginseng	β-caryophyllene; myrcene	Weight management & athletic recovery
Nerolidol	Sedative, relaxing, gentle sleep aid	GABAergic system modulation	Subtle even at low %	Jasmine; tea tree; lemongrass	Linalool; myrcene; phytol	Balanced formulations for subtle relaxation

Understanding individual terpene properties and recognizing how these compounds interact with each other and with cannabinoids to create composite effects are key to applying this information practically. This interaction, often called the “entourage effect,” creates challenges and opportunities for formulation.

Terpene combinations produce effects different from—and often greater than—their individual components. For example, myrcene and linalool produce deeper relaxation than either compound alone at equivalent concentrations. At the same time, α-pinene may potentiate the effects of other cannabis compounds, creating more balanced experiences. Understanding these interactions enables well-thought-out formulation strategies.

Using Sensory Panels to Map Terpene Experiences

Sensory evaluation helps document human experiences with terpene profiles. While establishing a complete sensory program requires significant investment, the strategy can be adapted to organizational resources and needs.

The foundation of practical sensory evaluation lies in proper panel selection. When conducting terpene testing for experiential effects, select panelists with:

• Diverse demographic characteristics
• No medical conditions that might impact sensory perception
• Demonstrated ability to identify and articulate sensory differences
• Commitment to multiple testing sessions for consistent data collection

Panel size significantly impacts data reliability. While market research might use large consumer panels (30+ people), professional sensory science typically relies on smaller panels (8-12 individuals) with extensive training. This approach produces more consistent, detailed assessments than larger panels of untrained participants.

Training helps to develop panelists’ ability to identify and rate specific effects consistently using standardized scales. A training program typically includes:

1. Familiarization with evaluation terminology and rating scales
2. Exposure to reference standards demonstrating specific effects
3. Practice evaluations with calibration feedback
4. Validation testing to confirm panel consistency

The evaluation methodology must be carefully designed to minimize bias and maximize sensitivity to subtle differences between samples. Critical elements include:

• Consistent delivery method appropriate to the product category
• Standardized dosing protocols
• Adequate washout periods between samples
• Random sample coding and presentation order
• Controlled environmental conditions
• Multiple independent evaluations per sample

Data collection instruments should capture the quantitative ratings and qualitative descriptions. Quantitative scales measure attributes like:

• Mental effects (clarity, focus, creativity)
• Physical effects (relaxation, energy, body sensation)
• Emotional effects (mood elevation, calmness, euphoria)
• Temporal patterns (onset time, duration, intensity curve)

When aggregated across multiple panelists and testing sessions, this data creates a comprehensive framework for terpene formulation. Statistical analyses then identify significant differences between samples and correlations between specific compounds and reported effects.

For product developers without access to professional sensory panels, simplified approaches can still provide valuable directional data. Internal team evaluations using standardized methods can also help identify major effect differences between formulations. Similarly, structured customer feedback programs can generate useful experiential data if properly designed to minimize bias.

Investing in sensory evaluation pays dividends through product differentiation and consumer satisfaction. When product offerings match their promised experiential effects, brands build trust. This is particularly valuable for companies developing white-label partnership products.

Adding Computational Analysis: AI Clustering for Pattern Recognition

Although human sensory panels provide the most relevant data on terpene effects, computational approaches offer complementary advantages in pattern recognition and predictive modeling. Machine learning techniques applied to terpene effect mapping can:

• Identify non-obvious correlations between compound combinations and reported effects
• Predict likely effects of untested terpene profiles based on similarity to known samples
• Optimize formulations for specific target experiences
• Recognize sensory response patterns across different consumer segments

Implementing machine learning in terpene effect analysis typically follows a structured approach.

1. First, the training dataset combines chemical analyses of terpene profiles (GC-MS data showing compound percentages) with corresponding sensory evaluation scores. The quality and quantity of this foundational data impact model accuracy, with robust models often requiring 50+ unique terpene profiles with complete sensory evaluations.

2. Feature engineering identifies the most relevant variables for analysis. These include:

• Individual terpene concentrations
• Compound ratios (e.g., myrcene:limonene ratio)
• Terpene class distributions (monoterpenes vs. sesquiterpenes)
• Total terpene concentration
• Presence of specific minor compounds

3. Clustering algorithms then identify patterns in how these chemical features correlate with reported sensory effects. Unsupervised learning approaches like k-means and hierarchical clustering can recognize natural groupings in the data without predetermined categories. These algorithms effectively sort terpene profiles into effect-based clusters based on chemical similarity and sensory outcomes.

4. Supervised learning techniques build on these patterns to create predictive models. Support vector machines, random forests, and neural networks can forecast the likely effects of untested terpene profiles based on their chemical characteristics. While not replacing sensory evaluation, these predictions help prioritize which formulations warrant full panel testing.

5. Visualization tools transform complex modeling results into accessible formats for product teams. Effect mapping visualizations can include:

• Spider plots showing multidimensional effect profiles
• Heat maps displaying compound-effect correlations
• Cluster dendrograms grouping similar terpene profiles
• 3D scatter plots positioning profiles in the effect space

For product strategists, these tools enable more efficient formulation by narrowing the testing field to the most promising candidates.

The true power of computational methods is evident when machine learning is merged with human expertise. Experienced formulators use AI-generated insights as a starting point, then apply their knowledge of terpene behavior, product requirements, and manufacturing constraints to refine formulations. This hybrid approach leverages computational pattern recognition and human creative judgment.

Companies are increasingly developing proprietary algorithms tailored to their product categories and consumer targets. These custom models incorporate brand-specific sensory data, customer feedback, and competitive analyses to create unique formulations aligned with brand positioning.

Building an Integrated Matrix for Product Development

The practical application of terpene effect mapping lies in creating a structured framework for product development. An integrated matrix connects specific terpene combinations to target effects to guide formulation decisions.

When developing new product lines based on experiential positioning, we recommend creating an effects grid organized along two primary dimensions:

• A Mental-Physical spectrum that maps effects from primarily cognitive (focus, creativity, alertness) to physical (body relaxation, tactile sensitivity, physical energy). This axis helps categorize experiences based on their primary location of perception.
• An Activation-Sedation spectrum that ranges from stimulating/energizing effects to calming/relaxing ones. This dimension addresses the fundamental arousal response, which significantly impacts consumer use occasions and product positioning.

Plotting target experiences on this grid creates product groupings that translate across different consumption methods and brand expressions. For example, a “Creative Focus” position combining mental clarity with moderate energy maps to a specific region of the terpene effect space characterized by:

• Moderate to high α-pinene (0.2-0.4%)
• Moderate limonene (0.2-0.3%)
• Low myrcene (0.1-0.2%)
• Supporting terpinolene (0.05-0.1%)

This approach can inform product development across multiple categories, from vape cartridges to tinctures to infused beverages. Effect-based formulation requires recognizing that terpene expression varies by product category due to:

• Thermal conditions during manufacturing and use
• Interaction with carrier materials
• Delivery efficiency to sensory receptors
• Temporal release patterns

To account for these variables, the terpene effect matrix must include product-specific adjustment factors. For example, products involving heat (vapes, smokeables) require compensation for thermal degradation of sensitive compounds like terpinolene and linalool. Similarly, edible products must account for first-pass metabolism effects on bioavailability.

To implement this approach, we recommend a phased development process with:

1. Foundational Effect Mapping: Establish baseline correlations between 5-7 primary terpenes and core effects through sensory evaluation
2. Formulation Architecture: Develop template profiles for primary effect categories (e.g., Energy, Calm, Focus, Creative)
3. Product Adaptation: Modify base formulations for specific delivery methods and product constraints
4. Validation Testing: Confirm effect consistency across product expressions through sensory evaluation
5. Continuous Refinement: Integrate customer feedback and additional sensory data to improve formulation accuracy

This structured approach allows product development teams to work from a ‘common effect’ framework and adapt to specific product requirements and brand positioning.

Implementing an Effect-Based Approach: Practical Steps

This roadmap provides a structured approach that is adaptable to various organizational capabilities.

1. Baseline Effect Catalog

Establish a foundation of 4-6 core effect categories aligned with brand positioning and target consumer needs. Rather than attempting to map every possible experience, focus on creating distinct, deliverable effect profiles with clear differentiation. For each effect category, define:

• Primary sensory characteristics
• Target use occasions
• Key consumer benefits
• Differentiating attributes from competitive offerings

This catalog creates the strategic framework for subsequent product development, ensuring formulation efforts align with market positioning.

2. Formulation Protocol

Translate effect categories into technical specifications through:

• Chemical profile targets (percentages of key terpenes)
• Acceptable range variations for each compound
• Critical compound ratios
• Minimum effective concentrations

We recommend beginning with focused profiles emphasizing 3-4 primary terpenes rather than attempting to recreate the full complexity of cannabis strains. This approach improves manufacturing consistency while maintaining effect precision.

3. Validation Methodology Selection

Choose an appropriate validation approach based on organizational resources.

• Full Sensory Panel: Ideal for larger organizations with significant R&D resources
• Structured Internal Evaluation: Practical for mid-sized companies with limited resources
• Sequential Consumer Feedback: Suitable for smaller operations with direct consumer relationships

Regardless of scale, implement structured data collection with standardized effect measurement tools. Even simplified approaches require methodological consistency to generate useful data.

4. Iterative Optimization Process

Establish a continuous improvement cycle by:

a) Creating initial formulations based on literature review and existing data

b) Conducting sensory evaluation using a chosen method

c) Correlating chemical profiles with reported effects

d) Refining formulations based on findings

e) Validating improved versions

f) Documenting learnings in the effect matrix

An iterative approach builds organizational knowledge while progressively improving formulation accuracy. Each cycle expands the effect matrix with additional data points and correlations.

5. Cross-Product Implementation

Apply effect-based formulation across product categories by:

• Developing delivery-specific adjustments for each effect profile
• Creating standardized testing protocols for effect consistency
• Establishing a common language for effect communication
• Aligning marketing materials with validated effects

This cross-category approach creates brand consistency while accommodating the technical requirements of different product formats.

6. Advanced Pattern Recognition Integration

As the data foundation grows, implement other analyses, e.g.,:

• Statistical correlation between specific compounds and reported effects
• Machine learning pattern identification across formulations
• Predictive modeling for untested compound combinations
• Consumer segment-specific effect mapping

These techniques build on the established framework, creating proprietary insights that drive ongoing product innovation.

For companies without extensive internal resources, partnerships with terpene experts like Terpene Belt Farms can accelerate implementation. External collaborations provide access to existing data foundations and testing methods without requiring full infrastructure development.

The Future of Effect-Based Product Development

Effect-based formulation will likely evolve from a competitive advantage to a baseline requirement. Several emerging trends will shape this evolution, such as:

Personalization and Adaptive Formulation

The next frontier in effect-based development involves recognizing and accommodating individual response variations. Factors influencing terpene effects include:

• Genetic differences in receptor expression
• Prior cannabis experience
• Age and gender
• Concurrent medications
• Individual metabolism variations

Companies are beginning to develop personalization systems that adjust formulations based on individual feedback. These systems use mobile applications to collect response data, then modify recommended products or formulations accordingly. This approach recognizes that while general effect patterns exist across populations, optimized experiences require individual calibration.

Temporal Experience Design

Besides single-point effects, formulation is moving toward designed experience journeys with intentional onset patterns, duration curves, and transition sequences. For example, an evening relaxation product might begin with limonene and α-pinene for mental unwinding, transition to β-caryophyllene and humulene for physical relaxation, and finish with myrcene and linalool for sleep support—all within a single product experience.

Cross-Modal Effect Integration

The most advanced effect design integrates terpene formulation with other sensory modalities to create multi-dimensional experiences. These approaches combine:

• Terpene effects (psychological and physiological)
• Flavor profiles (taste perception)
• Aromatic delivery (olfactory experience)
• Visual cues (packaging and appearance)

This integrated approach recognizes that consumer experience encompasses all sensory channels, with each element influencing overall effect perception. Research shows that visual and aromatic cues can significantly modulate perceived effects through expectation setting and sensory priming.

Expanded Application Beyond Cannabis

While cannabis and hemp products have driven terpene effect research, terpene formulation has potential applications in:

• Functional beverages
• Aromatherapy products
• Personal care formulations
• Nutraceuticals
• Fragrance development

The fundamental approach—correlating chemical profiles with sensory effects through structured evaluation—readily transfers to these adjacent categories. This expansion represents an excellent opportunity for organizations with established effect mapping capabilities.

As this field advances, the competitive advantage will shift from having access to effect data toward owning proprietary correlation insights and advanced formulation skills. Companies investing in these capabilities will establish a competitive edge in experience design beyond simple product differentiation.

Conclusion: From Chemistry to Experience

The shift from strain-based to effect-based product development represents a fundamental evolution in cannabis and hemp formulation. By systematically developing relationships between terpene chemistry and human experience, product developers can create more precise, consistent, and differentiated offerings to address consumer needs.

This transforms product development from art to science without losing the complexity and nuance that make cannabis formulation unique. Integrating sensory science, chemical analyses, and computational pattern recognition creates a robust framework for delivering specific experiences. For product strategists and marketers, effect-based formulation enables:

• More meaningful product differentiation beyond conventional categories
• Consistent experience delivery across manufacturing variations
• Targeted development for particular consumer needs
• Clear positioning based on validated effects
• Premium price positioning supported by measurable quality differences

While implementing this requires investment in testing protocols and data systems, the returns in product performance and brand differentiation justify the investment. Companies that establish leadership in effect-based formulation create sustainable competitive advantages based on proprietary knowledge and formulation capability.

The future belongs to brands that can reliably deliver on their experiential promises, not just through compelling storytelling but systematic formulation to create specific, consistent effects. As consumers increasingly seek products tailored to their desired experiences, effect-based terpene mapping will become essential for successful product development.

Ready to develop effect-based terpene formulations for your product line? Request Terpene Samples and experience the difference of authentic cannabis-derived terpenes.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why Are Strain Names Unreliable for Predicting Cannabis Effects?

Strain names are inconsistent due to genetic variability and cultivation practices. Growing conditions significantly impact terpene expression even in genetically identical plants, making strain names poor predictors of actual effects.

How Do Companies Map Terpene Profiles to Specific Effects?

Companies combine scientific literature review with human sensory panel testing. This data is then analyzed using machine learning to identify patterns and correlations between specific terpene combinations and reported effects.

What Are the Main Categories of Terpenes and Their Primary Effects?

Primary monoterpenes like myrcene (sedation), limonene (mood elevation), and linalool (anxiety reduction) provide foundational effects, while sesquiterpenes like β-caryophyllene (anti-inflammatory) and humulene (analgesic) offer complementary benefits. These compounds work synergistically to create the “entourage effect,” where combinations produce different and often stronger effects than individual terpenes alone.

How Can Companies Implement Effect-Based Product Development?

Companies should start by defining 4-6 core effect categories, establish formulation protocols with specific terpene targets, and choose appropriate validation methods, ranging from full sensory panels to structured internal testing. The approach requires iterative optimization and cross-product implementation and can be accelerated through partnerships with terpene specialists for companies with limited resources.

Sources Cited

Chan, W.-K., Tan, L., Chan, K.-G., Lee, L.-H., & Goh, B.-H. (2016). Nerolidol: A sesquiterpene alcohol with multi-faceted pharmacological and biological activities. Molecules, 21(5), 529.

Chen, L., Liu, Y., Xu, D., Zhang, N., Chen, Y., Yang, J., & Sun, L. (2024). Beta-Myrcene as a sedative–hypnotic component from lavender essential oil in dl-4-chlorophenylalanine-induced-insomnia mice. Pharmaceuticals, 17(9), 1161.

Christensen, C., Rose, M., Cornett, C., & Allesø, M. (2023). Decoding the postulated entourage effect of medicinal cannabis: What it is and what it isn’t. Biomedicines, 11(8), 2323.

Dalavaye, N., Nicholas, M., Pillai, M., Erridge, S., & Sodergren, M. H. (2024). The Clinical Translation of α-humulene – A Scoping Review. Planta Medica, 90(09), 664–674.

Hashimoto, M., Takahashi, K., & Ohta, T. (2023). Inhibitory effects of linalool, an essential oil component of lavender, on nociceptive TRPA1 and voltage-gated Ca2+ channels in mouse sensory neurons. Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports, 34, 101468.

Ikei, H., Song, C., & Miyazaki, Y. (2016). Effects of olfactory stimulation by α-pinene on autonomic nervous activity. Journal of Wood Science, 62(6), 568–572.

Itoh, M., Kitagawa, A., Ouchi, H., Yamaguchi, M., Watanabe, R., Sone, H., & Kamiyama, S. (2022). Effects of visual and aromatic stimulations on the perception of five fundamental tastes. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry, 86(5), 655–664.

Maayah, Z. H., Takahara, S., Ferdaoussi, M., & Dyck, J. R. B. (2020). The molecular mechanisms that underpin the biological benefits of full-spectrum cannabis extract in the treatment of neuropathic pain and inflammation. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Molecular Basis of Disease, 1866(7), 165771.

Menezes, I. O., Scherf, J. R., Martins, A. O. B. P. B., Ramos, A. G. B., Quintans, J. de S. S., Coutinho, H. D. M., Ribeiro-Filho, J., & de Menezes, I. R. A. (2021). Biological properties of terpinolene evidenced by in silico, in vitro and in vivo studies: A systematic review. Phytomedicine, 93, 153768.

Meyerding, S. G. H., & Groninga, Z. L. (2025). Consumer preferences for Cannabis products with THC content in Germany—The case of flowers. Applied Food Research, 5(1), 100912.

National Cancer Institute. (n.d.). NCI dictionary of cancer terms. Cancer.Gov. Retrieved May 27, 2025

Scandiffio, R., Geddo, F., Cottone, E., Querio, G., Antoniotti, S., Gallo, M. P., Maffei, M. E., & Bovolin, P. (2020). Protective effects of (e)-β-caryophyllene (BCP) in chronic inflammation. Nutrients, 12(11), 3273.

Schwabe, A. L., & McGlaughlin, M. E. (2019). Genetic tools weed out misconceptions of strain reliability in Cannabis sativa: Implications for a budding industry. Journal of Cannabis Research, 1(1).

Song, Y., Seo, S., Lamichhane, S., Seo, J., Hong, J. T., Cha, H. J., & Yun, J. (2021). Limonene has anti-anxiety activity via adenosine A2A receptor-mediated regulation of dopaminergic and GABAergic neuronal function in the striatum. Phytomedicine, 83, 153474.

Zandkarimi, F., Decatur, J., Casali, J., Gordon, T., Skibola, C., & Nuckolls, C. (2023). Comparison of the cannabinoid and terpene profiles in commercial cannabis from natural and artificial cultivation. Molecules, 28(2), 833.